Willingham says, “Good teaching is good teaching, and teachers don’t need to adjust their teaching to individual students’ learning styles.” You suggest that listeners are taking this statement out of context. But it’s the last line in the video, summing up, and follows the sentence, “What I’ve said about that theory (visual, auditory and kinesthetic) goes for the others too.”

You complain, “Mr. Downes charges me [and others] with having closed the case on learning styles.” In your other post, immediately after citing Willingham, “…teachers don’t need to adjust their teaching to individual students’ learning styles,” you conclude, “Sounds good to me.” http://www.matthewktabor.com/2008/08/21/learning-styles-dont-exist/

It’s very annoying to see people say one thing, and almost in the same breath see it being denied as even having been said. It’s blatant dissemblance, and treats the reader as though he or she is unable to read.