Why I’m Voting for John Lambert, Jim Seward and Not Bill Magee
I‘m not an evangelical voter, though I’m happy to have any honest discussion about politics. I like information and understanding.
I’m not a secretive voter, either. I don’t mind telling anyone how I vote or why I do it.
As a resident of Otsego County, I’ve got 3 local races to vote on tomorrow:
- Otsego County Judge, Jill Ghaleb [D] vs. John Lambert [R]
- 111th NY Assembly District, William Magee [D], unopposed
- 51st NY Senate District, Jim Seward [R] vs. Don Barber [D]
Otsego County Judge, Jill Ghaleb [D] vs. John Lambert [R]
Mr. Lambert turned in an impressive performance last Monday at SUNY Oneonta. Though the Otsego County Judge handles mostly Family Court cases - about 70% are family cases, I think [***please read the addendum below] - a deep knowledge of Surrogate’s and Criminal Courts is necessary. Lambert’s experience as Asst. District Attorney has prepared him will for the job. While Ms. Ghaleb’s familiarity with the Family Court is admirable, it isn’t enough to warrant a 10-year term as Otsego County Judge.
Ghaleb’s speech at the SUNY Oneonta event was weak. I want a clear, confident, knowledgeable judge on the County bench. Mr. Lambert talked to us like a judge. Ms. Ghaleb talked to us like a kindergarten teacher.
My vote for Otsego County Judge is for John Lambert.
*** Mr. Lambert’s campaign sent a brief explanation of the 70% Family Court figure. I could have been more clear, but what’s above does imply that the majority of cases heard by the Judge are Family Court cases. I referred to the number of cases, not the Court’s commitment to those cases.
In short, it stands to reason that several custody hearings are easier than a single murder trial. They explain it this way:
“In your blurb about John, I couldn’t help but see that you mention that Family Court is 70% of the job. Unfortunately, this statistic is misleading. Ms. Ghaleb wants us to believe the job is 70% family court, but it’s just not true. For example, in county court during a given week there may be 5 family court matters. One a day for the week. In that same week there could be one trial in criminal court. That one trial could take the entire week (usually longer). There are also several steps to a criminal trial that need to take place outside of the court room as well.
So, as far as Ms. Ghaleb’s statistics are concerned, the above scenario would count as 5 family court cases and 1 criminal court case – While the number of family court cases may show a number at or around 70%, the time it takes to run a single criminal trial is actually much longer.
If Ms. Ghaleb’s numbers were true then Otsego County would probably have its own Family Court Judge like many other surrounding counties. Also, if the criminal court aspect was less than 15-20%, then Otsego County would not need a full time district attorney and 4 assistants to handle the case load.”
I’d contend that the numbers are true, just that Ms. Ghaleb hasn’t been clear about the meaning of those numbers. I’ve found her commitment to statistics favorable to her to be disingenuous.
111th NY Assembly District, William Magee [D], unopposed
Though William Magee is running unopposed, I will not vote for him.
I don’t know Assemblyman Magee personally, but he seems like a delightful guy. Unfortunately, Magee could be the posterboy for the philosophy that has turned Central New York into a stale, atrophying wreck.
Check Magee’s questionnaire for the Observer-Dispatch - including his answer of “Yes.” to whether the state Legislature could reduce property tax burdens.
Magee is all over the board philosophically with little for substantial plans. Property tax cuts, yes - school funding from the state? Yes as well, though that tax money has to come from somewhere Magee hasn’t disclosed. He’d like to stop the ‘brain-drain’ but thinks that making New York a “mecca of green” and pushing an ad campaign for hiking and biking will do the trick.
Bill Magee, your platform could be held responsible for 111th District New Yorkers under the age of 35 being damned miserable. I don’t care that you’re unopposed - I won’t give you a vote. It might not be your fault personally, but what you stand for is a problem.
And if I’d known sooner that the Republicans didn’t have a candidate to run against you, I would’ve run against you myself. I thank Assemblyman Magee for his many years of service, but I’d like to see him move along in 2010.
My vote for the 111th NY Assembly District is for no one, despite William Magee running unopposed.
51st NY Senate District, Jim Seward [R] vs. Don Barber [D]
I attended the 90 minute Seward/Barber debate in Oneonta last Monday. It was a clear victory for Jim Seward, who is one of the finest, most benevolent politicians in New York State. I think if Seward moved to Park Slope, even those folks would drop their arugula and pick up an “Another Family for Seward” sign.
Don Barber comes off as a sneaky, dishonest leftist - not to be confused with a liberal. As I wrote about Barber’s school funding ideas, he’s comfortable with a bait’n'switch on taxes and state healthcare.
I like openness and honesty, and it’s why Barber received the lowest grade [D+] of any profiled candidates who submitted an answer.
I sincerely believe what Barber says about wanting universal healthcare for New Yorkers, and in a way, this race will gauge the 51st District’s interest in and support for that issue. Barber does not, however, address the issue honestly in terms of how the fiscal ramifications will impact New Yorkers.
Seward has exercised excellent judgment during his tenure and has balanced well the interests of our District’s businesses and citizens. Seward is responsible, responsive and has progressive ideas for how to keep Central New York’s talented younger generation in New York - like tax credits to forgive student loans over a 10-year period for those who take up residence. I can’t imagine where Central New York would be right now if it wasn’t for the work of Seward and friends.
In this case, I want more of the same - not a shifty leftist bent on bankrupting our businesses to fulfill the agenda of the Democratic party’s social engineers.
My vote for the 51st NY Senate District is for Jim Seward.
No Responses to “Why I’m Voting for John Lambert, Jim Seward and Not Bill Magee”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
- Why I’m Voting for John Lambert, Jim Seward and Not Bill Magee - [...] Why I’m Voting for John Lambert, Jim Seward and Not Bill Magee In this case, I want more of ...